PRESIDENTIAL PROTECTION: A SHIELD FOR PRESIDENTS?

The question of whether presidents should be granted immunity from legal prosecution is a debated one. Advocates for immunity argue that it is necessary to allow presidents to adequately perform their duties without the constant threat of criminal charges. They contend that immunity safeguards against frivolous claims and allows focus on governing.

The notion of immunity has always been fascinating. A robust defense mechanism is often seen as a sign of strength and health. But could immunity be more than just a natural safeguard? Could it, in fact, become a weapon to control power dynamics within groups? The potential for immunity-based discrimination is a serious matter Moral questions